In Defense
of Orgo Night #1
Just
a few days before the Columbia University Marching Band’s “Orgo Night” show was
scheduled to occur at midnight in Butler Library’s College Reading Room (Room
209)—a tradition every semester dating back at least four decades—university officials
decreed that the Band was prohibited from performing in the Library. This decision was sprung on the Band with no
advance notice and no opportunity for discussion. The stated reason for banning the Band from the
Library was to preserve the room as a quiet study space for students who might
be disturbed by the Orgo Night show. Here is a picture of the students taking
advantage of that opportunity for quiet study at 11:59 p.m. on the night of the
scheduled show, December 15.
There were
a few, but we suspect that they were just getting ready to go watch the Band’s show,
which was staged outside on the Library steps in sub-freezing conditions.
The timing of the announcement, the
dubious validity of the claimed reasons for the action, and the administration’s
total unwillingness to discuss the issues or consider alternatives all strongly
suggest that the real issue was not quiet study space or the sanctity of
library rules. Rather, President
Bollinger and Dean Valentini were actually attempting to deny a forum for the Band’s
hilarious but often outrageous barbs at the university and its commentary on
current and sometimes sensitive events. The
decision to censor the Band was ill-conceived, wrongly executed, and
inconsistent with the ideals of our Columbia.
In order to show support for the
Band, to shine a bright light on this unjustified action, and to demonstrate
that alumni as well as students are extremely angry about the university’s
ambush tactics, a group of concerned alumni have collaborated to draft a series
of pamphlets to elucidate the issues. This
initial installment outlines the controversy and the reasons why alumni,
Trustees, faculty, and students should be concerned. Later installments will investigate the
critical issues in greater detail. At
bottom, the university’s stated reasons for taking this sudden action are false
and not supported, nor would they have justified terminating the Orgo Night
tradition even if they were true. Since there
is no legitimate reason to have made this decision, the inevitable conclusion
is that the university administration’s objective is censorship of student
expression. This is unacceptable. We are hopeful that, even if President
Bollinger and Dean Valentini have no qualms about taking a heavy-handed approach
against students, they will take the time to read these discussions and
reconsider their decision in light of the views of concerned alumni.
The truest
indication of intelligence is the ability to admit when you are wrong and to
change your mind. As Abraham Lincoln
famously stated, “So soon as I discover my opinions to be erroneous, I shall be
ready to renounce them.” Although
university administrators are notoriously loath to admit error, particularly in
the face of protests by mere students, this is one instance where a bad
decision needs to be reversed and reversed quickly.
Orgo Night Is A Proud Columbia Tradition
There is no dispute that the Orgo
Night event has been a tradition at Columbia since approximately 1975. Each semester at midnight on the night before
the Organic Chemistry final exam, the Band crowds into Butler Library and
performs its program. The format of the show
has varied over the years, but has historically included both music and
satirical/comedic monologues. The
program is advertised around campus and anticipated by hundreds of students who
welcome the comedy break in their finals preparations.
For years,
the University has not only allowed these programs every semester in Butler
Library, but even promoted Orgo Night as a proud and unique Columbia tradition. During on-campus days for prospective
students and in published guides and brochures aimed at high school seniors,
the office of undergraduate admissions cites Orgo Night as a positive
experience at Columbia that entering students can look forward to enjoying or
even taking part in by joining the Band. In a Winter 2012-13 Columbia magazine article about the history of the Marching Band, Orgo
Night was prominently featured in a cartoon showing the Band marching into the Library
to the applause and laughter of the assembled students.
That article described Orgo Night as “one of the best
Columbia arts traditions.” In the spring
of 2014 a Spectator article described
the Varsity Show and Orgo Night as “competing for Columbia’s laughs.” The Vice-President for Alumni Relations
acknowledged that alumni “honor and treasure the tradition of Orgo Night.”
Orgo Night is more than merely a
tradition. For the students who attend,
it is a welcome break from the stress of upcoming finals and an opportunity to
laugh along as the Band skewers university administrators and other Ivy League
schools with a mix of campus-specific “inside” jokes and broader political and
social satirical commentary. For the Band,
it is one of the central performances of each semester and an opportunity to
connect and share with the broader campus community. It is a quirky and unique event that
exemplifies Columbia’s history of irreverent criticism, free speech and, in the
midst of serious studies, a little bit of fun.
Orgo Night is one of the things that makes the Columbia experience
something students remember fondly after graduation as a quintessentially
“college” activity.
After the university’s announcement
that the Band would not be permitted to perform in Butler Library, support for
the Band came pouring in. The Spectator and BWOG objected to the change and supported the Band. All four undergraduate student councils
supported the Band and urged the administration to change its decision. Letters and emails from alumni similarly
objected to the change. And when the
Band staged a “protest” show on the steps of the Library, hundreds of current
students left their studies behind and showed up in sub-freezing temperatures
to cheer on the Band as it attempted to carry on the tradition under brutal
conditions.
Orgo Night is venerated and
valuable; supported by current students and alumni alike. A future pamphlet will document the Orgo Night
tradition in more detail. Such an
institution should not be interfered with or discontinued without careful
consideration and open discussion, and then only based on clear evidence of a
compelling reason.
The University’s Claimed Rationale Is Obviously False
The principal reason given for
banning Orgo Night from Butler Library is that the performance disrupts the
quiet study space during reading week.
University administrators, however, have not substantiated the claim
that students have complained, that anyone’s ability to study quietly is
actually disrupted by the Orgo Night show, or that alternative quiet study
locations are not readily available. The
university’s stated rationale is intentionally deceptive and demonstrably false.
Vice-Provost and Head Librarian Ann
Thornton and her boss, Provost John Coatsworth, delivered an edict to the Band
in December that the show could not take place in the Library as
scheduled. Ms. Thornton told Band
leadership that she had decided the Orgo Night show was inappropriate for “her”
library. Although Ms. Thornton did not
expressly base her objection on the show’s content, she provided no other
rationale for the sudden decision apart from her concern that Orgo Night
interfered with the Library’s “proper” use as study space. Later, in a written statement, Ms. Thornton asserted
that the show “has been a source of stress” for some students because the show
is “disrupting [to] those who wish to study.”
Ms. Thornton’s statements imply that these concerns were expressed to
her by actual students. President
Bollinger then stated expressly that there were “a number of objections and complaints”
that prompted action regarding Orgo Night.
Certainly, over the years some
people have complained about the Orgo Night programs’ content. It is likely that university administrators
would prefer to avoid complaints that some student or student group were
offended by something the Band said during the Orgo Night show. We, of course, are not privy to all private
complaints received by university administrators, but until now the university
has never asserted that any students have griped about the diminished
opportunity to study in the College Reading Room or complained that they felt
“stressed” by the need to find another location to study.
For decades, students have known
that at midnight on the night before the Organic Chemistry final, the Orgo
Night program will take place in the College Reading Room. The Band publicizes the program throughout
the campus in famously comic posters. It
is not credible to believe that any students find themselves suddenly surprised
by the arrival of the Band on Orgo Night and are therefore interrupted in their
studies for a short time without their knowing consent. As the Spectator
editorial board stated on December 15, “to claim that students would be
irreparably distracted from their studying by a publicized event in a place
they could easily avoid for one hour a semester is absurd.”
In a letter to alumni who objected
to the Band’s eviction from the Library, Dean James Valentini stated that the
decision was based on “established library use guidelines.” Of course, those same library use guidelines
have existed for the entire history of Orgo Night, which is an established exception to the normal
rules. The Macy’s Thanksgiving Day
Parade is a violation of New York City traffic regulations, but the City
permits it annually as an exception to the normal rules because it is a
valuable and traditional event. So too, Orgo
Night has been permitted for decades despite not complying with library use
policy. This thin reed of a
justification is even flimsier than the disruption-to-studies claim, and the
fact that Dean Valentini would not even assert the existence of
quiet-study-based complaints speaks volumes about the chimerical nature of
President Bollinger’s claim that student complaints about study disruption were
the basis for this decision. A future
essay will address in more detail the evidence that the university’s claimed
reason for banning the Band from the Library is false.
Any Actual Concerns About Quiet Study Space Easily Could Have
Been Addressed Without Evicting the Orgo Night Show from Butler Library
If there were actually a need for
more quiet study space, the university easily could have addressed those
concerns without attempting to cancel Orgo Night by evicting the Band from
Butler Library. Other locations were
available for students who wanted to study quietly somewhere other than Butler
209. The Lehman social sciences Library
and the Science and Engineering Library were both open until 3:00 a.m. on
December 15th. These spaces,
along with dedicated study space in dormitory buildings, provided ample quiet
midnight locales for students who wished to avoid the disruption of the Band’s
performance. Signs could have been
posted outside of Butler 209 reminding students that the Orgo Night show would
take place at midnight and advising them of alternate quiet locations where
they could study, to relieve the “stress” of finding other space.
Ms. Thornton has asserted that
quiet study space is limited at midnight as part of her reasoning for wanting
to keep Butler 209 free of distractions.
Even assuming that other available midnight study space is overcrowded
(and we seriously doubt that), arrangements could have been made to keep space
in other library buildings open slightly later than otherwise scheduled on this
one night. Avery Library and the
Mathematics Library were open until 11:00.
The Business and Economics Library was open until midnight. Keeping one of these buildings open an extra
hour or two would have been a minimal expense to Columbia, and certainly less
costly than opening up Roone Arledge Auditorium at midnight as an alternate site
for the Orgo Night show, which the administration said it was willing to do. Certainly, the interests of the students who
look forward to the Orgo Night show should be weighed more heavily than the
interests of the hypothetical students who might be disrupted by the show or slightly
inconvenienced by needing to find alternate space.
A future essay will investigate
this issue in more detail, but the bottom line is that the university’s
proffered reasons for the sudden change in policy are entirely suspect and
likely a mere façade shielding a much more invidious motive that the university
cannot openly admit.
Censorship of the Band Is the Real Issue
Since the university’s publicly stated
reasons for the last-minute change in policy about the Orgo Night show are so
obviously fatuous, and since the administration was totally unwilling to
consider alternatives that would have fully solved the claimed problem, the
logical conclusion is that university administrators were really trying to
muzzle the content of the Band’s program.
Although President Bollinger stated at the 2016 Convocation ceremony
that, “We don’t censor speech,” the university seems to be trying to quash the Band’s
show based on objections to its content.
Apparently, President Bollinger and
Dean Valentini were happy to use the new Head Librarian’s desire to keep the Orgo
Night program out of her library as an excuse to suppress the content of the Orgo
Night program without having to admit that the intent is censorship rather than
protection of quiet study space. Or
perhaps the scheme was hatched by Bollinger and Valentini, who enlisted their
new Head Librarian’s assistance so they would have a cover story to shield them
from criticism.
Certainly, the plot to suppress Orgo
Night included a specific strategy to mute any objections by waiting until only
a few days before the scheduled fall show to notify the Band. Ms. Thornton and the Deans anticipated that alumni
objections as well as student objections could not be mobilized effectively in
the few days between the announcement and the show. They also no doubt calculated that, after the
event, it would be finals week followed by winter break, allowing any passions
to wane. They were willing to absorb a
short period of controversy over their censorship of Columbia students, but no
doubt hoped that the controversy would be soon forgotten.
Ms. Thornton’s explanation that she
had to line up support among the Deans, and it just happened that she obtained
the needed agreements at the very last minute, is exceedingly disingenuous. The December Orgo Night program could have
been allowed to proceed as scheduled and then an announcement could have been
made in January that the administration wanted to explore an alternative location
for future Orgo Night performances. This
would have permitted open discussion and would have allowed the administration
to assess the level of support for the performance among students (and alumni),
to determine whether there really is a shortage of quiet study space, and to weigh
the interests of the affected students in an open and reasoned way. But President Bollinger did not want a
reasoned dialogue because the claimed rationale for the decision would not
stand up to even slight scrutiny.
During discussion of the Orgo Night
controversy at the University Senate meeting on December 15, President
Bollinger stated, incredibly, that the announcement to prohibit the Orgo Night
show from happening in its traditional location had been made “with ample time
to allow for discourse with the students.”
This statement shows either an amazing capacity for self-delusion or a
remarkable lack of respect for the intelligence of his audience. Other comments at the Senate meeting reveal
the administration’s true motives.
Former Dean Robert Pollack stated that it was appropriate to reconsider
a tradition like Orgo Night “for the sake of the greater good.” “Greater good” being an obvious euphemism for
the administration’s objections to the program content of Orgo Night and not a
reference to a few hypothetical students whose study time might be interrupted. Senator Ronald Breslow, a chemistry
professor, was more transparent, objecting to Orgo Night because “that’s not a
good message . . . the right to make fun of people who actually come here for
serious reasons.”
The conclusion one must draw from
these facts is that the university administration acted to diminish the Band’s
ability to hold its program and reach its target audience because of the
content of the program. The administration,
of course, is unwilling to admit that it engaged in censorship of student
speech, but no other conclusion is logically possible. A future essay will focus more specifically
on this issue, but it is clear that suppression of the Band’s message and
content is the university’s goal.
In recognition of the appearance of
censorship, the university offered the Band the option of holding its program
in the Roone Arledge Auditorium as an alternative to the College Reading Room. The offer, however, fails to acknowledge that
the eviction of the Band from Butler 209 changes the nature of the event and destroys
the tradition. The fundamental premise
here is that the tradition of Orgo Night – including its location in Butler in
the midst of the students cramming for finals – should be preserved unless
there is a compelling reason to make a change.
The essential nature of Orgo Night is that it does represent an interruption of the grind of studying in the Library
and, as such, it is welcomed by the students who assemble there in anticipation
of the show. Telling the students that
they need to pack up and move to a different building in order to hear the
performance and then migrate back to the Library afterward (if they want to
continue studying) was unquestionably intended to reduce the audience, end the
tradition, and thereby silence the content of the Orgo Night performance.
President Bollinger’s position that
it was too much bother to keep another library open a few extra hours and that
banning the Orgo Night show from the Library was the only way to accommodate
the needs of a small number of hypothetical students who might be disrupted in
their finals preparations fails to pass the “smell test.” It smells bad. It smells like censorship.
The Solution
The solution is for the
administration to reverse this misguided policy and to restore Orgo Night to its
traditional Butler 209 location. If
additional study space is needed on the night of future performances, and if
the university determines that already open space is not sufficient, then
another library should be kept open for a few extra hours. It really is that simple.
Action is needed now. Discussion, if the administration wants to
have some honest discussion, should take place openly and with full disclosure
of the motives, facts, and evidence.
Anything less is unbecoming of Columbia.
H
-
Hamiltonius
No comments:
Post a Comment